Skip to main content

Research

Industry views & methodology

General research written for all readers. We talk about method and data — not entry/exit calls or hot tips.

Filter by topic6 articles
MethodologySeptember 6, 2026· 8 min read

What We Call “Working” Is Not What You Call “Making Money”

The first two articles tested 20,934 chart patterns and 49 technical signal types. Both returned zero. But readers keep asking the same question: then why do some people make money? Half the answer is not in the data — it is in the definitions. We never measured profit, our shortest holding period is one trading day, and we require a signal to survive an average of 2,661 occurrences while a trader needs only their own few dozen trades. Change nothing but the benchmark and the share of test cells that "work" falls from 81% to 22%.

Read article
MethodologyAugust 25, 2026· 14 min read

49 Technical Signals, Zero Passed

Moving averages, stochastics, RSI, MACD, Bollinger Bands, candlestick patterns, Fibonacci retracements, plus multi-timeframe trend conditions — 49 signal types, 1.78 million events, 11,025 test cells, and zero survived FDR correction. But the real story is this: following my own written specification produced 5 significant findings, four of them Fibonacci. What stopped them was a control run I did not strictly need — because the control produced 5 as well.

Read article
MethodologyAugust 23, 2026· 33 min read

20,934 Chart Patterns, Zero Passed

A point-in-time reconstruction of S&P 500 membership from 2000 to 2017, 20,934 detected chart patterns, three layers of benchmark, and a multiple-testing correction. Of 245 test cells with adequate sample size, zero survived. The scope is chart patterns only — RSI, MACD, stochastics and the rest were never tested. This article is about that zero, about an intermediate conclusion I had to retract, and about a question the study cannot answer: even if you do beat the index, is the excess worth what it costs you.

Read article
Market HistoryAugust 15, 2026· 15 min read

What It Took to Collect the Average: Crashes, Recovery Time, and the Cost of Being Wrong

US equities returned about 6.9% a year in real terms over 126 years. This is the bill for that number: every drawdown of 20% or more, how long each took to recover, why the answer changes completely depending on which ruler you use, and the arithmetic of how much a side bet actually costs when it fails.

Read article
Market HistoryAugust 15, 2026· 14 min read

The Break-Even Line: 126 Years of US Inflation and What Standing Still Costs

Burton Malkiel's point that merely breaking even requires a return equal to inflation is easy to nod along to and harder to feel. So we measured it: every year of US inflation from 1900 to 2025, what cash and bonds and stocks actually returned against it, and why the single most-quoted number about the stock market leaves out most of the return.

Read article
MethodologyAugust 6, 2026· 11 min read

How to Calculate the S&P 500 Index from Individual Stocks

A step-by-step walkthrough of the divisor-based, float-adjusted market-cap formula behind the S&P 500 — how to turn one stock's price move into index points, where every input actually comes from, and exactly where the common shortcuts break down.

Read article